CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY IN GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN OFFICIAL AND PERSONAL CONTEXTS

Authors

  • Guntur Rambey Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Surya Perdana Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Arifin Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.4655

Abstract

Procurement of goods and services is a very urgent need in a developing country, the need for goods and services certainly requires quite large funds to obtain them. Service Users (in this case the Government) certainly expect good quality goods and services with the smallest amount of capital, while Service Providers (in this case the Contractor) will expect large profits, these two interests will attract each other. other. Procurement of goods and services is increasingly chaotic due to the lack of legal regulations in the form of laws, while the legal regulations used so far are only at the level of Presidential Decrees (Kepres) and Presidential Regulations. When talking about Procurement of Goods and Services, it includes several legal provisions, namely Civil law, if it concerns contracts, of course the legal consequence is a Civil lawsuit, if it concerns administrative decisions then it will be resolved through the Administrative Court, then if there is an allegation of a criminal act of misappropriation of State finances it will be resolved through criminal law, however, the specific legal rules for criminal liability for perpetrators of procurement of goods and services still use the provisions of general criminal law and the Corruption Crime Law. The method used in this research uses normative research. Normative legal research methods are research that positions law as a building system of norms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad. 2000. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Amiruddin, 2010, Korupsi Dalam Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa, Genta Publising Yogyakarta

Bagas Pandega Hariyanto Putro, E. S. (2015). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Uang. Jurnal Law Reform

Chairul Huda, 2008, Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media

Indah Sari, 2020, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Dalam Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Perdata”, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara.

Kanter dan S.R. Sianturi. (2002). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Storia Grafika

Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata, Yulianto Achmad, 2022, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empriris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta

Romli Atmasasmita, 2017, Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan (Geen Straf Zonder Schuld), Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Roeslan Saleh, Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

R. Subekti, 1998, Hukum Perjanjian, Intermassa, Jakarta

Rosa Agustina. 2003. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Pasca Sarjana FH Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang, 2014, Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Good Governance, Jurnal.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-06-24