Concept of Business Dispute Resolution from a Justice Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.4642Abstract
Business activities are broader than trade, because the scope of business activities is not only trade, but covers broader fields such as production, processing, distribution, trade/marketing, export-import, procurement of goods/services, labor recruitment services, business consulting services , credit, credit guarantees, insurance, business cooperation, investment, mass media, property, capital markets, and others. The concept of resolution is that a private judge is not bound by various formalities, is quick in giving decisions, because it is in the final instance and is binding, which is easy to implement because the parties will obey it. Juridically based on Article 1 point 1 of Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (UUAAPS) arbitration is a method of resolving a civil dispute outside the general court which is based on an arbitration agreement made in writing by the parties to the dispute. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia said that ADR is a concept of cooperative resolution of conflicts or disputes outside of court which is directed at an agreement or solution to a conflict or dispute that is "win-win". What is meant by a "win-win" solution is a solution or agreement that is able to reflect the interests or needs of all parties involved in the conflict (shared interest).Downloads
References
Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004)
Cita Yustisia Serfiyani, R. Serfianto D. Purnomo dan Iswi Hariyani, Bisnis Online dan Transaksi Elektronik (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2013).
Dhaniswara K. Harjono, Arbitrase Sebagai Sarana Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia (Jakarta: UKI Press, 2022).
Gatot Soemartono, Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006)
Joni Emirzon, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di luar Pengadilan (Negosiasi, Mediasi, Konsiliasi, dan Arbitrase) (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2001)
Joni Emirzon, Hukum Bisnis Indonesia (Jakarta: Prenhalindo, 2002).
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Edisi Kedua (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003)
Munir Fuadi, Hukum Bisnis dalam Teori dan Praktik, Buku Kedua (Bandung: PT. Citra Adity Bakti, 1999).
Munir Fuady, Pengantar Hukum Bisnis (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002).
Munir Fuady, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pendekatan Kontemporer) (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2010)
Rahayu Prasetyaningsih, “Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman,” Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 8, No. 5 (2011)
Rudy A. Lontoh, Denny Kailimang, dan Denny Ponto, Penyelesaian Utang Piutang: Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Bandung: Alumni, 2001)
Satjipto Raharjo, Ilmu Hukum, Edisi Revisi (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1991).
Sri Retno Widyorini, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Dengan Cara Arbitrase”, Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, (Oktober, 2006)
Sudargo Gautama, Arbitrase Dagang Internasional (Bandung: Alumni, 1979)
Susanti Adi Nugroho, Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2015).
Umar Haris Sanjaya, Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dalam Hukum Kepailitan Kewenangan Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Untuk Mengeksekusi Harta Debitor Setelah Terjadinya Perdamaian Dalam Kerangka PKPU, Cetakan Pertama (Yogyakarta: Gama Media Printing, 2014).
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Herikson P. Siahaan, Triono Eddy, Ramlan Ramlan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















