Diplomacy Conceptualization For The Security State On Mineral Resources In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.4239Abstract
Diplomacy is considered for the security state on mineral resources in Indonesia since Indonesia is a law country and has many mining sector possibilities which need to be secured, and created in response to reduce negative impact on mineral illegal mining activities which cause many negative results for Indonesia. Therefore, the Indonesia government needs an alternative effort which lines with the principles concluded by this research. By literatrue reviews employed for the investigation on some international practices published by reputable-indexed journals with the same issue, this research performs an information for the armed forces and the leadership of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. In the absence of a generally accepted definition of "mineral mining activity diplomacy," the state (in this case, Indonesia) attempts to tailor its content to the requirements of the mineral resource security strategy. The study results that diplomacy involving natural resource mining has broad applicability to Indonesia since it encompasses state security policy creation and execution, as well as the establishment of permanent, cooperative international ties in the defense sector. The first step in realizing the concept's potential as a significant instrument is to conceptualize the mineral resource mining activity diplomacy for the security state in Indonesia from illegal mining activities.Downloads
References
Agung, A., Perwita, B., Arkan, M., & Rossiana, Y. S. (2022). INDONESIA ’ S REGULATED DIPLOMACY THROUGH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO FIJI. Jurnal Dinamika Global, 7(2), 313–328.
Ambarsari, K. W., Sumarlan, S., & Dwiyanto, H. (2021). THE INDONESIA REGULATED DIPLOMACY TO SPAIN YEAR 2014-2018 TOWARD THE COOPERATION IN THE FULFILMENT OF DEFENSE AND SECURITY EQUIPMENT. Jurnal Pertahanan Media, 7(2), 232–242.
Atteridge, A., Aung, M. T., & Nugroho, A. (2018). Contemporary mineral resource dynamics in Indonesia SEI working paper 2018-04. July 2022. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27690.29128
Chang, J. Y., & Jenne, N. (2020). Velvet fists: The paradox of regulated diplomacy in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Security, 5(3), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2020.16
Drab, L. (2018). Regulated diplomacy – an important tool for the implementation of foreign policy and security of the state. Security and Defence Quarterly, 20(3), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.5152
Fetic, S. G. (2014). Fields of classic diplomacy with which regulated diplomacy interacts horizontally. Preventive diplomacy, coercive diplomacy. Land Forces Academy Review, 19(1), 10. https://www.armyacademy.ro/reviste/rev1_2014/FETIC.pdf
Gumay, R. N. S., Octavian, A., & Swastanto, Y. (2018). Regulated diplomacy Implementation: the Synergy of Indonesia and Australia in Dealing With Illegal Immigrants in the Sea Border. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 8(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v8i1.278
Huda, I. M., Nazrif, M., & Mohd, B. (2022). Regulated diplomacy As Statecraft : Projecting Malaysia ’ S Middle Pow Er in the Post Cold War Era. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 562–574. http://journalppw.com
Just, P. (2016). Politics in central europe. 14(3).
Khamrakulova, G. Z. K. (2021). Theoretical Aspects Of Foreign Policy Research: Case Study Relationships Of South Korea And Uzbekistan. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 03(04), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume03issue04-33
La, E. Y., Nucleares, N. D. E. A., Dee, M., Meier, O., Finger, A., & Nan, L. (2012). Europe and the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons /. October.
Lackenbauer, P. W., Lajeunesse, A., Manicom, J., & Lasserre, F. (n.d.). and What They Mean for Canada.
Mara, D., Nate, S., Stavytskyy, A., & Kharlamova, G. (2022). The Place of Energy Security in the National Security Framework: An Assessment Approach. Energies, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020658
Moustafa, Y. M. M. M. (2015). Petroleum in View of its Classification , Assay and Analysis By Ass . Researcher / Eman Saied A . Ibrahim International E – Publication (Issue November).
Muniruzzaman, A. N. M. (2020). Regulated diplomacy: A Powerful Tool of Statecraft. CLAWS Journal, 63–80.
Mustaza, S. N., & Saidin, M. I. S. (2020). Volume 28, Number 2, 2020. Light & Engineering, 28(02–2020), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.33383/2020-2
Nurmala, M. (2021). Regulated diplomacy Strategy in Global Governance to Face the Global Threats. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(12), 3976–3980. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-73
Nyathi, G. L., & Risman, H. (2020). Africa’S Search for Peace and Stability: Regulated diplomacy and Conflict Resolution in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Drc). Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Ttg Kajian & Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism & Integrity, 6(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v6i2.720
Rech, M. F. (2014). Be Part of the Story: A popular geopolitics of war comics aesthetics and Royal Air Force recruitment. Political Geography, 39, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.07.002
Rifai-Hasan, P. A. (2009). Development, power, and the mining industry in Papua: A study of Freeport Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(SUPPL 2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0371-y
Riyadi, F. A., & Dewi, I. M. (2022). Role of Regulated diplomacy for the Development of the Indonesian Defense Industry. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.55208/jebe.v16i1.249
Rosado, D. P., Ribeiro, D. F., & Mel, N. (2022). Quintuple Helix Innovation Model for the European Union Defense Industry — An Empirical Research.
Sianturi, S. M. (2021). Indonesian Regulated diplomacy in Achieving Cyber Security Through ADMM-Plus 2014-2019. Literatus, 3(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v3i2.300
Singh, J. (2021). Regulated diplomacy : An Appraisal in the Indian Context. CLAWS Journal, 15(2), 108–124.
Soares, J. (2021). Chapter 2: A Literature Review on Comprehensive National Defence Systems. NATO SAS152 Research Task Group Report on Comprehensive National Defence Systems, July, 56.
Storey, I. (2021). Russia’s Regulated diplomacy in Southeast Asia: A Tenuous Lead in Arms Sales but Lagging in Other Areas. ISEAS Perspective, 33, 1–16. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2021-33-russias-defence-diplomacy-in-southeast-asia-a-tenuous-lead-in-arms-sales-but-lagging-in-other-areas-by-ian-storey/
Sudarsono, B. P., Mahroza, J., & D.W., S. (2018). The Diplomacy. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 69–88.
Sumarlan, S., & Dohamid, A. G. (2021). Indonesia regulated diplomacy strategy in resolving china claims to Indonesia exclusive economic zone in north natuna sea. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(02). https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.02.033
The Terrace BSD Consulting. (2014). Scoping Mission Understanding the Context of the Colombian Mineral resource Sector. October. http://goo.gl/ueDuWo
Trochowska-Sviderok, K. (2021). Sustainable Security: Revolution or Utopia? European Research Studies Journal, XXIV(Issue 2), 369–395. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2132
Venti, M. D. S. (2022). Japan-France Relationship under Abe: An Analysis of Security Trends for the Indo-Pacific Region. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 16(3), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.51870/VEQO1925
Winger, G. (2014). The Velvet Gauntlet: A Theory of Regulated diplomacy. What Do Ideas Do?, 3, 13. http://www.iwm.at/publications/5-junior-visiting-fellows-conferences/the-velvet-gauntlet/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Redi, Tina Amelia, Tina Amelia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
