Conventional and Unconventional Brand Protection in IndonesiaConventional and Unconventional Brand Protection in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.4066Abstract
This study aims to determine the legal protection of conventional and unconventional brand registration in Indonesia. This research is normative research using legal materials to solve facts or legal issues and to obtain legal materials and analyze them through literature studies (legislation and literature). This study used 2 (two) problem approaches, namely the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The findings revealed that conventional brand is limited to signs in the form of pictures, names, words, letters, numbers, color arrangements, or combinations of elements that have distinguishing features and are used in trading activities of goods or services. However, for a product/service that does not qualify in terms of a conventional brand, it is generally known as a unconventional brand. The regulation of non-conventional marks in Indonesia is outlined in Article 1 (1) of Law 20/2016. However, this regulation only covers marks in the form of three dimensions, sound, and holograms. Indonesia currently only regulates unconventional marks that fall under these categories. This poses a potential issue as the market is witnessing a growing variety of marks, and the regulation of position marks has not yet been addressed in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Dewi, N. P. W. P., & Sukihana, I. A. (2019). Pendaftaran Suara Sebagai Merek Non Tradisional Berdasarkan Undang–Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(10), 1–13.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2019). Modul Kekayaan Intelektual Bidang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis.
Gastinel, E., & Milford, M. (2001). The legal aspects of the community trade mark. Kluwer law international.
Gunawan, M. S. (2010). Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 51 Tahun 2007 Tentang Indikasi Geografis Pada Batik Pekalongan Sebagai Upaya Hukum Dalam Mempertahankan Ciri Produk Batik. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Hidayah, K. (2017). Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Setara Press.
Indriyanto, A., & Yustina, I. M. (2017). Aspek Hukum Pendaftaran Merek. Rajawali Pers.
Irianti, A. K., Winarno, B., & Alam, M. Z. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Merek 3 Dimensi Menurut Undang-Undang No. 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek. Universitas Brawijaya.
Irmansyah, R. A. (2010). Penerapan Hukum Hak Cipta Seni Batik Pekalongan (Studi Hukum pada Dinas Perindustrian, Perdagangan, Koperasi, dan UMKM Kota Pekalongan). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Jened, R. (2014). Hukum Hak Cipta (Copyright Law). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Jened, R. (2015). Rahmi Jened, Hukum Merek (Trademark Law) dalam Era Global dan Integrasi Ekonomi. Rajawali Pers.
Mahmud, P. M. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada.
Mayana, R. F. (2017). Perlindungan Merek Non Tradisional Untuk Produk Ekonomi Kreatif Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek, Indikasi Geografis dan Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2(1), 26–41.
Puspa, P. M., & Yanti, A. A. I. E. K. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Konsep Position Mark Sebagai Merek Non-Konvensional Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Wicara, 12(11), 575–583.
Rahmi, J. (2007). HKI. Penyalahgunaan Hak Ekslusif. Airlangga University Press.
Rideau, C. (2011). POSITION MARK-A category of signs eligible for trade mark protection? Different standards of examination, different scope of protection?, 2009/2010, s. 5 f.
Setyawan, A., Sulistianingsih, D., & Yudistira, I. B. (2017). Non-Traditional Trademarks in Indonesia: Protection under the Laws and Regulations (An Intellectual Property Law). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 2(2), 123–130.
Suparmin, A. (2018). Asuransi Syariah Di Indonesia Hukum Prospek Dan Tantangan. El-Arbah: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Perbankan Syariah, 1(01), 1–30.
Tarigan, A. N., & Raja, P. L. (2022). Influence of Celebrity Endorser and Brand Image on Purchase Decision of Erigo Products: (Study on Erigo consumers in Medan City). Journal Of Management, Accounting, General Finance And International Economic Issues (MARGINAL), 2(1), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.55047/marginal.v2i1.415
Tritanaya, N. I., & Yulianingsih, W. (2022). Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum Merek antara Prinsip First to File Hukum Indonesia dan Prinsip First to Use pada Hukum Australia. Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 2(3), 229–243.
Zainnullah, A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum pada Merek Asing dan Terkenal (Wellknown Mark) atas Passing Off di Platform Marketplace Indonesia. UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Monica Olivia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















