Authority To Determine A Person To Become A Justice Collaborator In The Criminal Justice Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v20i1.3353Abstract
The Investigation is the initial series of the criminal justice process. In practice, the examination process requires witness statements in finding a bright spot in the case. Justice collaborators are a means to facilitate investigators in uncovering cases. Technically, protection in the form of awards for justice collaborators is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Joint Regulations. Applications are submitted by the perpetrators themselves to the Attorney General. Furthermore, in the event that the Attorney General grants the request for an award, the Public Prosecutor must state in his lawsuit the role played by the justice collaborator in assisting the law enforcement process so that it can be considered by the judge in making a decision. The purpose of this study resulted in the determination of investigators who have the authority to determine the Justice collaborator. Results of the study The presence of a justice collaborator in disclosing a case, especially one that is organized crime is urgently needed considering that its role is very central and urgent. The cooperation of justice collaborators with law enforcement officials can facilitate the task of disclosing a crime, especially those related to the public interest (openbare order) or the state. The logical consequence is that one of the instruments that can be used to encourage disclosure or reporting of a crime is by providing guarantees and protection to justice collaborators because without this role it is very difficult to disclose organized crime, usually these difficulties arise due to weak support. evidence/evidence obtained due to the limitations of law enforcement officials in obtaining evidence that is significant enough to reveal the crime. Problematic and overlapping aspects of who can determine a person to become a justice collaborator, whether the LPSK, Investigator, Prosecutor, or Judge. In order to create legal certainty, the authority to determine someone to become a justice collaborator is the authority of the investigator as the first institution to carry out legal proceedings.Downloads
References
Ade Maman Suherman, Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Huku Civil Law, Common Law, Hukum Islam, Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004. Abdul Haris Semendawai, Eksistensi Justice Collaborator dalam perkara korupsi catatan tentang urgensi dan implikasi yuridis atas penetapannya pada proses peradilan pidana, Stadium General Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2014,
Amir Ilyas dan Jupri, Justice Collaborator Strategi Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Genta Publishing, Jakarta, 2017,
Artantojati Sigit,” Perlindungan terhadap saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama (justice Collabiorator) oleh lembaga perlindungan saksi dan korban”, Tesis, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2012,
Dani Durahman et all, Efforts To Build The Integrity Of Investigators To Realize Just Law Enforcement Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues Volume 24, Special Issue 1, 2021
Eddy Hiariej, Legal Opini Sidang Pleno Mahkamah Konstitusi Perihal Pengujian Pasal 10 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang No. 13 tahun 2006 tentang LPSK
Erasmus Napitupulu, LPSK Peran dan pengalaman Penegakan hukum terkait perlindungan saksi korban untuk beberapa kasus, Jurnal LPSK Edisi 4 Volume 1 tahun 2014,
Firman Wijaya, Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator dalam perspektif hukum, Penaku, Jakarta, 2012,
Floriana C Roa, Business Ethis and Social Responsibility, Philippine Copyright, First Edition, Manila 2007,
Hambali Thalib, dkk. The Role Of Justice Collaborator In Uncovering Criminal Cases In Indonesia, Diponegoro Law Review, April 2017, Volume 02, Number 01
http://budisansblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/ Justicc- Collaborator-mungkinkah . html diakses tanggal 30 Januari 2023
Lilik Mulyadi, Perlindungan Hukum Whistleblower & Justice Collaborator, Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime, Alumni, Bandung, 2015,
Muhammad F.A., dkk, The Reform Of Corrution In Indonesian: The Prismatic LawIn The Recent Context, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 25, No.1, Feb.2013,
M.Syukri Akub dan Baharuddin Badatu, Wawasan Due Process of Law Daiwa Simon Peradilan Pidana, (Jakarta: Rangkang Education), 2013,
Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Kontemporer, Kencana, Jakarta, 2010,
Rusli Muhammad, Pengaturan dan Urgensi Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum NO. 2 VOL. 22 APRIL 2015:
Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor Faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum, Raja Grafindo, 2012,
Supriyadi Widodo Eddyono, “Prospek Penggunaan Pelaku yang Bekerjasama di Indonesia” Jurnal LPSKVolume ke 1, No. 1 Tahun 2011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dani - Durahman, Fangky Christina Indraguna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















