The Analysis of Decision of The Constitutional Court Number 97/Puu-Xiv/2016 Concerning Population Administration on The Rights and Position of Believers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.2973Abstract
The research is to take a closer and explicit look at the position of believers in the Constitutional Court's decision through synchronizing the existence or existence of believers in Yogyakarta. In order to ensure whether or not these concerns are true, and to what extent are the rights and positions guaranteed in the decision of the Constitutional Court, and what is the position of believers in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUUXIV/2016 concerning Population administration in terms of perspective (Maqāṣid ash-Syarī‘ah). The type of legal research used in the preparation of this research is field research, which is conducting direct observations with in-depth interviews with sources that have been determined based on the researcher's knowledge using the purposive sampling method. The approach used in this research is normative juridical (Statute Approach) and empirical or sociological juridical. The normative juridical approach is carried out by referring to the legal norms contained in the legislation, decisions and legal norms that exist in society. The results of the research show that the considerations of the judges of the Constitutional Court related to the Philosophical, Textual, and Sociological Legal Interpreters in deciding the case Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 concerning the review of the Population Administration Law, have fulfilled the basic rights of believers and provide justice to adherents of the sect. trust, then when viewed with the study of Human Rights the Constitutional Court'sDownloads
References
A Djazuli. (2003). Fiqh siyasah. Prenada Media.
Albert H Y Chen. (2000). The Interpretation of the Basic Law-Common Law and Mainland Chinese Prespecties. Hong Kong Journal Ltd.
Amad Imam Mawardi. (2012). Fiqih Minoritas Fiqh al-Aqliyat dan Evolusi Maqasid al- Syari’ah dari Konsep ke Pendekatan, cet. Ke-1. Lkis.
Antonio Cassssesse. (n.d.). Hak Asasi Manusia di Dunia yang Berubah, yang diterjemahkan oleh: A. Rahman Zainuddin dari judul asli: Humn Rights in a Changing World.
Asafri Jaya Bakri. (1996). Konsep Maqasid al-Syari’ah Menurut al-Syatibi. PT. Raja Grafindo.
Asplund, K. D. (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Pusham UII dan University of Oslo.
asy-Syatibi. (2004). Al-Muwāfaqāt fi Uṣul asy-Syarī‘ah. Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Asy-Syāṭibī. (2004). Al-Muwāfaqāt fi Uṣul asy-Syarī‘ah. Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Diantha, I. M. P. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Prenada Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=-MpADwAAQBAJ
Dr. Jonaedi Efendi, S. H. I. M. H., & Prof. Dr. Johnny Ibrahim, S. H. S. E. M. M. M. H. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ
Jimly Assdhiqqie. (1997). Teori dan Aliran Penafsiran Hukum Tata Negara. Indo Hill Co.
Jimly Assdhiqqie. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Majda el-Muhtaj. (2009). Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konstitusi Indonesia: dari UUD 1945 sampai dengan Amandemen. Kencana.
Muhammad Firdaus, dkk. (2007). Pembangunan Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia : Sebuah Panduan. Komnas HAM.
Mukti Fajar ND dan Yulianto Achmad. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Muwaffiq Jufri. (2020). Potensi Penyetaraan Agama Dengan Aliran Kepercayaan Di Indonesia Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Jurnal Komisiyudisial.
Nashihin, H., Yahya, M. D., & Aziz, N. (2020). Morality and Expression of Religious Moderation in " Pecinan ”. Dalimunthe 2016, 24158–24168.
Nasihin, H., & Puteri Anggita Dewi. (2019). Tradisi Islam Nusantara Perspektif Pendidikan Multikultural. Islam Nusantara, 03(02), 417–438. https://jurnalnu.com/index.php/as/article/view/135
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Qamar, N., Syarif, M., Busthami, D. S., Hidjaz, M. K., Aswari, A., Djanggih, H., & Rezah, F. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods). CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=hfacDwAAQBAJ
Syafi’ie, M. (2012). Instrumentasi Hukum Ham, Pembentukan Lembaga Perlindungan Ham Di Indonesia Dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), 681–712
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Abidin Latua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















