Notary Responsibility for Legal Smuggling in the Issuance of Absolute Deed of Power of Attorney for Sale and Purchase of Land

Rizky Hadiwidjayanti; Liza Prihandhini

doi:10.31941/pj.v22i1.2288

Authors

Rizky Hadiwidjayanti University of Indonesia
Liza Prihandhini University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.2288

Abstract

This paper analyses the Notary's Responsibility for Legal Smuggling Acts in the Issuance of Absolute Power of Attorney for The Sale and Purchase of Land. In analysis used juridical-normative legal research methods. The data were collected through literature studies and analyzed qualitatively. This study concluded that in the case of the Batulicin District Court Decision Number 06/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bln, a notary named Pang Andreas Pangestu committed an unlawful act because he issued a Deed of Power of Attorney, which was categorized as an Absolute Power of Attorney containing the clauses referred to in the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14 of 1982, which was a form of legal smuggling to avoid obligations and prohibitions that had been regulated in legislation. Therefore, the Power of Attorney Deed was annulled. The Notary, in his position as a PPAT in doing the deed, is burdened with his responsibility. Such duties include criminal, civil and administrative liability. In this case, the Notary can be subject to civil commitment, which is punished with compensation of Rp 1,500,000,000 (one billion five hundred million rupiah) due to unlawful acts committed by him and can be subject to administrative responsibility also because the Notary committed violations in the UUJN, especially Article 16 paragraph 1 letter a.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Book

Muljadi, Kartini dan Gunawan Widjaja. 2005. Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan: Hak Tanggungan, Jakarta: Kencana.

Prajitna, A.A Andi. 2010. Pengetahuan Praktis Tentang Apa dan Siapa Notaris di Indonesia. Surabaya: Putra Media Nusantara.

Syamsudin, 2012. Budaya Hukum Hakim: Berbasis Hukum Progresif Edisi Kedua Jakarta: Kencana.

Simanjuntak, P.N.H. 2015. Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana.

Journal

Disemadi, H. S., & Mustamin, W. Pembajakan Merek Dalam Tatanan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 6(1), 2020. Pp. 83-94.

Emelia, Ema. Tinjauan Yuridis Kuasa Mutlak Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris Menurut Perundang-undangan Di Indonesia, Premise Law Journal, vol. 10, 2015, Pp. 5.

Jiwantara, Firzhal A., et al. "Konsep Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi di Indonesia." Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, vol. 3, no. 2, 2022, doi:10.36418/jiss.v3i2.545.

Kadir, Rahmia, et al. "Pertanggungjawaban Notaris pada Penerbitan Covernote." Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, vol. 31, no. 2, 2019, pp. 191-204, doi:10.22146/jmh.35274.

Maslikan, and Sukarmi Sukarmi. "Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Berkaitan dengan Kontrak Kerjasama." Jurnal Akta, vol. 5, no. 1, 5 Mar. 2018, doi:10.30659/akta.5.1. Pp. 11 - 16.

Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani., & Said, M. Y. Metodologi Normatif dan Empiris dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1-20. 2021

Ramadhan, Eka D., and Eni D. Suhardini. "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta yang Didasarkan pada Keterangan Palsu Dihubungkan dengan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan." Wacana Paramarta, vol. 18, no. 1, 2019, pp. 29-38, doi:10.32816/paramarta.v18i1.64.

Widjangkoro, Hanung. "Analisa Yuridis Pencantuman Klausul Kuasa Mutlak di dalam Perjanjian Hibah." Perspektif: Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan, vol. 21, no. 3, 30 Sep. 2016, pp. 211-219, doi:10.30742/perspektif.v21i3.194.